Hi Everyone,
My podcast episode’s structure resembles the “Morning
Edition” structure because the first line is the opening scene where I
introduce the topic. However I introduce the topic for a couple of lines! The triangle represents “history and
context” as Bradley Camphell explains so that resembles my podcast as well since I talk about the history of language change. Then the
individual lines represent connections that characters have to the story. In my
podcast the characters are the different implications and the research that I
found about the “because noun” phrase which answers my research question. The
research question is that: how does language change affect writers? And I found
research that supports the fact that changing language does not affect writers
negatively. The research and implications are connections to the story of the
“because noun” phrase. Therefore, this structure resembles the structure of my
podcast.
Nonetheless, I don’t return back to the beginning of my
podcast directly. Meaning I do answer my
research question but I don’t have a direct connection between the opening and
ending scene. I will make a connection because as Professor Bell said in
lecture that it is more effective to tell a story than facts. This is because
the story will stay with the listener. So the structure of my podcast resembles
the “Morning Edition” and I will make the structure of my podcast resemble this
structure completely. This is because I will have a better story for my
audience to hear.
This structure is similar to Lexicon Valley's structure because they also talk about the history and generally about the topic for a couple of minutes before they actually answer the research question. Then they answer the research question with different studies and research done on the topic. So my podcast does follow the typical structure of Lexicon Valley's podcasts.
I counted 20 citations in episode 102.
No comments:
Post a Comment